Comparison · Independent · Updated June 2026
Kaspr vs Lusha
In short
Kaspr (7.0/10) and Lusha (7.3/10) score almost level on our rubric; the right pick depends on what you're optimising for. Kaspr leads on pricing & transparency, while Lusha leads on compliance.
Scorecard, side by side
| Our rubric | Kaspr | Lusha |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 7.0 | 7.3 |
| Data accuracy | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| Coverage | 6.5 | 7.0 |
| Ease of use | 9.0 | 9.2 |
| Pricing & transparency | 7.5 | 7.0 |
| Compliance | 4.5 | 6.0 |
Scores come from the same rubric applied to every provider. Higher value in each row is highlighted.
Third-party ratings
| Public rating | Kaspr | Lusha |
|---|---|---|
| G2 | 4.4/5 (838) | 4.3/5 (1,667) |
| Capterra | – | 4.0/5 (398) |
Pricing & data, side by side
| Attribute | Kaspr | Lusha |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | from £468/yr | from $449/yr |
| Pricing transparency | Published | Published |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| Verified email | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile / direct dials | ✓ | ✓ |
| Intent data | – | ✓ |
| Website visitor ID | – | – |
| CRM enrichment | ✓ | ✓ |
Feature by feature
A union of both vendors' documented features. A dash means the vendor doesn't list that attribute, not necessarily that it's missing.
| Feature | Kaspr | Lusha |
|---|---|---|
| Work / direct email | yes | yes |
| Mobile numbers | Yes (pulled from LinkedIn) | Yes (10 credits each) |
| Intent data | no | Yes (job changes, funding, hiring) |
| Website visitor ID | no | no |
| Enrichment & lead management | yes | yes |
| Chrome / LinkedIn extension | yes | yes |
| CRM integrations | HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, Aircall | Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Outreach |
| Free plan | Yes (+ 50 sign-up credits) | Yes (40 credits/mo) |
| Contract | Monthly or annual (Org: annual) | Monthly or annual |
| GDPR / compliance | GDPR-aligned; €240k CNIL fine (2024) | ISO 27701/27001, SOC 2; Garante probe open |
| Europe coverage | Strong (esp. France & UK) | Weaker than EU specialists |
| US coverage | Thin | Strong |
| Owned by | Cognism (since 2022) | no |
| UK coverage | no | Strong |
Visit Kaspr
We may earn a commission when you buy through links on this site. It never affects our scores, rankings or verdicts. See our methodology.
Kaspr
Pros
- Pulls mobiles and emails straight from a LinkedIn profile, group or event in seconds via the Chrome extension.
- Strong European (especially French and UK) mobile coverage, backed by parent company Cognism's data.
- Genuine free plan plus low entry pricing (£39 / $49 per user) with transparent £/€/$ rates.
- Ease of use is the dominant praise across its G2 reviews (4.4/5 from 800+).
Cons
- France's CNIL fined Kaspr €240,000 in December 2024 for unlawfully collecting LinkedIn data, a material flag for regulated buyers.
- Auto-renewal charges and difficulty cancelling are a recurring theme in user reviews.
- US coverage is thin; it works best as a European prospecting tool, not a primary US source.
- The four-pool credit system (phone / direct-email / B2B-email / export) is easy to misjudge.
Lusha
Pros
- One-click Chrome extension and near-zero learning curve, the most-praised feature on G2 (4.3/5) and Capterra (Ease of Use 4.6/5).
- Reliable verified email and direct-dial data for the US, UK and Canada.
- Genuine free plan (40 credits/month) plus transparent published pricing; test before you talk to sales.
- Independently audited under ISO 27701, ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II, with TrustArc and ePrivacyseal validation.
Cons
- The credit model bites; revealing a phone number costs 10× an email, so phone-heavy teams burn credits fast.
- Per-seat pricing and reported 8–15% renewal increases push real team cost above the headline.
- Coverage and accuracy thin out across continental Europe and APAC versus EU specialists like Cognism.
- Italy's data-protection regulator opened an investigation in 2025 into how Lusha sources data; a 2020 exposé questioned its early sourcing.
Frequently asked questions
- Is Kaspr or Lusha better?
- Kaspr (7.0/10) and Lusha (7.3/10) score almost level on our rubric; the right pick depends on what you're optimising for. Kaspr leads on pricing & transparency, while Lusha leads on compliance.
- Which is cheaper, Kaspr or Lusha?
- On entry pricing, Lusha is the cheaper way in (from $449/yr vs from £468/yr). Credit models differ, so compare what you actually pay per 1,000 contacts, not just the headline.
- Can I use Kaspr and Lusha together?
- Yes, teams often pair a broad database with a specialist tool. Just avoid paying twice for the same coverage; check where Kaspr and Lusha overlap before buying both.